|
Rice, Robin. “Jill Bonovitz.”
American Ceramics. Volume 11, Number 2, Spring 1994,
ill.
In recent earthenware vessels and a wall installation
of matte glazed porcelain vases, Jill Bonovitz says
more with less. Never an artist of ornament or elaboration,
Bonovitz at one time incorporated lines of poetry
and layered colors in works of simple form and subtle
surface. Now, her interest in ceramics as poetic and
spiritual expression has been further refined to a
formal mantra in large, open, velvety bowls. A more
playful but equally reductive sensibility is expressed
in antic grouping of white cylinders.
In the center of the gallery, seven pools of pale
color float above discreet gray pedestals. Each is
a flattened vessel about two feet in diameter rising
a generous handsbreadth from a small but not precarious
foot. Tints of terra sigilata bloom softly: jades,
grays and powdery earth colors. Each work is a round
monochrome painting, a self-contained terrain in which
pooling, rippling densities of fluid slip, calligraphic
smears in relief and scratches on the surface suggest
a crypto-narrative, almost a geologic history.
Each piece appears weightless, cloudlike, timeless:
metaphors for being or the world perhaps. Simultaneously,
each is an utterly mundane, not-quite regular, not-quite-irregular
object with weight, density and texture–an unpretentious,
undisguised product of the artist’s hand.
A second body of work consist of 53 unglazed porcelain
cylinders formally installed in small familial rows
on wall-mounted shelves. The stark silhouettes are
uniform in size with glossy, almost vitrified surfaces.
Pronounced spiraling bulges in Bonovitz’s small
freely-thrown vases confirm a connection to Japanese
teabowls, but these vessels maintain a staid verticality
balanced on pearl-like feet, like chess pieces or
pre-Columbian figurines.
The thinness and irregularity of the thrown forms
suggest that the artis has strectched the clay to
the limits of stability. This, like the delicacy of
the added coil elements, appears to comment on the
fragility and arbitrariness of the human condition,
but obliquely, without anguish. Like Bonovitz’s
luminous blows, these objects imply something more
vast and profound than human concerns.
|